Tuesday, April 7, 2015

American Sniper

Clint Eastwood's adaptation of the life story of Navy Seal Chris Kyle garnered Academy Award nominations, and was the top-grossing film released in 2014.  It is an interesting film which tries to function in as non-political a vacuum as possible, but ultimately (for me) cannot get away from such matters.  

Kyle (Bradley Cooper) was a young man without a purpose in life, until he decided to enlist (at an age older than most would) in the Navy Seals.  There he finds purpose, and even meets his wife Taya (Sienna Miller) while stationed in San Diego.  He gets shipped out right after his marriage, and ends up an elite sniper in Iraq. 

Flashbacks to young Chris' life show that his father believed there were three kinds of people in the world:  sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs.  Chris is told to be a sheepdog, and as the overwatch sniper for units doing door-to-door searches in Iraq, he finds his calling.  

The film open with a stone cold, suspenseful scene where Chris sights a woman approaching his convoy with what appears to be a grenade--which she then hands to a child.  Chris has to decide whether to take that shot.

As the film progresses, we see the toll the war takes on Chris.  His marriage is rocky--he rarely sees his kids, and when he is home, he can only think of returning to the battlefield.  He cannot stop thinking about the soldiers' lives he saves by stopping bad guys--wolves--from doing them harm.  He is undone by the shots he has to take, and the losses in his unit.  

A rival sniper working for the Iraqis is Chris' dark mirror--he has to put a stop to this man, who is crippling their operations and killing American soldiers.

From moment to moment, Sniper works like a well-oiled machine, intense and deeply felt, due to two men:  Eastwood and Bradley Cooper.  Eastwood has never been a flashy director, but he knows how to film action scenes so you can see what is going on, but that still ramp you up, and he does not put in a lot of "look at me" psychology or fancy shots--his approach serves this material well.  

Cooper--whom has become one of our best actors--completely steps into Kyle's skin, never judging, just inhabiting the man.  (I would have been fine with him winning for Best Actor.)  However, I could not stop thinking about the Iraq invasion, and scenes of soldiers kicking in doors and rousting citizens just didn't sit right with me.  

And the rival sniper--how is what he is doing any different (ideology aside) than what Kyle was doing?  The movie does not grapple with these thorny issues, and as such, is a tense, well-done war film, but lacks any insight into the greater struggles.  

Kudos are due, however, for dealing with Chris' post-war life, and his struggle with PTSD.  Ironic that the very thing he did to help himself--help other veterans--led to his unfortunate death.  The end of the movie is sobering, but again, lacks any insight into the greater irony of a man that survived a war zone, but died in Texas by another American's gun. (Dude, that can't be a spoiler--everyone knows what happened to Kyle.) 

Grade:  B+.



A Most Violent Year

I really wanted to love this movie, writer/director J.C. Chandor's love letter to New York and the movies of Sidney Lumet. 

In 1981 New York, Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac) is a mostly fair and clean businessman, working in a corrupt industry--the oil heating business.  Abel is looking to expand the company he bought from his father-in-law and turned into a success, by buying a dock and refinery lot from Hasidic businessman.  He puts up his entire savings on the down-payment, and has a short window of time to pay the remainder, or forfeit his deposit, But forces are marshalling against Abel. A rival is hitting his trucks - with armed goons roughing up his drivers, stealing the trucks and draining them of the oil shipment. 

As the film opens, Julian (Elyes Gabel) is sent to the hospital after one such hijacking, and the pressure is on Abel to protect his fleet.  The Union rep wants to arm the drivers, which is against the law, and threatens to pull them off the trucks if they are not.  An ambitious District Attorney (David Oyelowo) investigating the oil heating business is intent on indicting Abel.  And Abel has moved into a new house with his wife Anna (Jessica Chastain) and their kids, and a man lurking outside one night drops a gun outside their window.  The bank is getting restless about the hijackings and possible indictments. 

 It all reaches a head when Julian returns to the job, and he is hijacked again, pulls a gun, and gets into a gunfight with the hijackers, on a bridge.  When Julian flees the scene, Able needs to hand him over to the cops, or things will get even worse for him.  And what does Anna know about the books they are hiding from the D.A.?  

There are a lot of things to admire in Chandor's film (not the least of which are good performances from two of our best actors in Isaac and Chastain, and great supporting work from Albert Brooks, among others) but there are some scenes that just don't ring true.  And the ending fell flat to me, with a melodramatic turn that just didn't work and screamed "first draft, young ambitious writer."  Shame.  Chandor is a solid filmmaker, and the look of the film, and the recreation of 1981 New York was spot-on, but it just fell a bit short.  

Grade:  B.


Inherent Vice

Paul Thomas Anderson is one of my favorite filmmakers, but he has increasingly followed his own muse (even when adapting other people's material), and seemingly takes a view of "if the audience can follow along and get into my groove, fine.  If not, that's fine, too."  Long story short, I was on board with Anderson's adaptation of Thomas Pynchon's cock-eyed private eye tale.  



Joaquin Phoenix plays Larry "Doc" Sportello, a beach bum/stoner/private detective, still carrying a flame for his ex, when she walks through his door one night.  Shasta Fay (Katherine Waterston) had taken up with a rich real estate magnate, Michael Wolfman (Eric Roberts), and now fears his wife and other cohorts are scheming to get Wolfman committed to an institution, because he has now embraced the hippie lifestyle, and wants to give away his newest housing development "to the people."  

Doc takes on the case (how could he say no to Shasta) and proceeds to go down the rabbit hole of Nazi bikers, Oriental massage parlor workers, missing musicians, and crazy dentists (Martin Short memorably playing one memorable tooth doctor.)  

A lot of folks have had a hard time following the plot, and others saying that you aren't even supposed to follow the plot, that it is beside the point.  I actually don't think this view is valid.  It is a complex story, that ambles and lurches into all kinds of strange alley ways, and Anderson does his best to be circumspect and spare when it suits him, but the plot does make "sense."  

Anchored by Phoenix's perpetually laid back (and very stoned) protagonist, Vice floats by on an almost psychedelic wave of early 70's paranoia.  At heart the film is really about the "squares" versus the hippies, and how the Establishment hates the hippies, but also envies them, and how the Establishment co-opted the things they liked (free love, recreational drugs) and put their own spin on them, at the same time they tried to deny the parts of the hippie lifestyle that don't make anybody any money! 

In some ways, the film (and I assume this bent comes from Pynchon's novel) is a funny, wry, but deep down kind of angry and sad look at the Powers That Be.  One of the most interesting angles is how the drug culture gets turned into a vertically integrated Big Business, involving all kinds of unlikely types.  But mostly, the film is Doc bumping into all sorts of odd folks, including a completely wonderful Josh Brolin as Doc's cop frenemy "Bigfoot" Bjornsen, whom all by himself, encapsulates the push and pull of societal forces at work.  

It is hard to recommend a movie as shaggy and lengthy as this one, but for me, the time spent was very enjoyable, and flew by.  For my money, another winner from a director who is yet to make a bad film.  

Grade: A 

Kingsman: The Secret Service

Based on the graphic novel The Secret Service by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons, co-writer/director Matthew Vaughn has done the incredible--made a movie better than the comic--and the comic was already awesome! 

Colin Firth stars as Harry Hart, a very well-dressed, dapper English fellow, who is really a Kingsman--a "knight" in a very secret, well-funded, and unaffiliated (as in, not beholden to any government) spy organization.  As the film opens, an operation in the Middle East goes sideways, and a Kingsman is killed. 

Harry comforts the widow and her young son, "Eggsy" (real name Gary), and offers them a phone number for one favor to be cashed in.  Years later, Eggsy (Taron Egerton) is all grown up, and is running in the mean streets of London.  His mother has a gangster boyfriend, and when Eggsy runs afoul of his gang, he steals a car and ends up in jail.  He calls the secret number, and Harry bails him out.  

At the same time, an operation in Switzerland goes wrong, with a Kingsman killed trying to rescue a kidnapped climate scientist (played by Mark Hamilll.)  When a Kingsman falls, all the knights nominate one person to enter the training program, to cull down to one recruit to take the fallen knight's place.  Harry takes another look at Eggsy, who has great grades and gymnastic skills, but a poor attitude.  Harry believes the Kingsman are doing themselves a disservice by being class snobs, and he nominates Eggsy as his candidate.  

The rest of the film details Eggsy's lunatic training program (which seems designed to almost kill the candidates!) and Harry's investigation into the missing scientist, and other missing leaders.  His search brings him into the path of eccentric tech billionaire Richmond Valentine (Samuel L. Jackson), and a conspiracy that threatens to kill a lot of the world's citizens.  (All for a good cause, it should be said.)  

I won't detail Valentine's plan, as it is very shocking and should not be spoiled.  It is obvious that Kingsman is a bit of a cheeky take on James Bond and other spy thrillers, but there are two approaches you can take to this kind of parody.  
  • The Airplane or Austin Powers route, and go for full-blown, parodic comedy.  
  • The Scream and Shaun of the Dead tact, which is to make fun of some of the conventions, but still take the genre seriously, and use it to make specific thematic points. 
Kingsman takes the second approach, and winds up with an action film that is just flat-out fun, with kinetic action sequences, colorful dialogue, and wonderful characters.  At its heart, Kingsman is a critique of the class struggle in England (which is better than it used to be, but has never gone away.)  

Firth is a revelation as the butt-kicking would-be Bond, and Egerton steals the show with his cheeky but naive personality (and innate good nature.)  Great supporting work from Mark Strong and Michael Caine does not hurt, and Jackson seems to be having a ball playing the villain here.  

Be warned--the film is a bit violent (particularly during one segment), but the point seems to be that James Bond films would not go there, but hey, we are going full-bore on what would really go down.  I had so much fun with this energetic film that never forgets to add the right touch of levity, but never mocks the genre.  I wanted to see it again right away, so that's my endorsement, right there.  

Grade: A-

.

The Imitation Game

I love movies about process, and about hidden history.  



I had heard of Enigma, the machine the Germans used for transmitting unbreakable coded messages during World War II, and the codebreakers working to unlock its secrets and end the war.  I had heard of Alan Turing, but didn't connect him to Enigma.  





The Imitation Game works on two very interesting levels: 
  • An account of Turing and his team's efforts to break the Enigma machine (an effort that was only de-classified more than 50 years after the fact) 
  • A condemnation of close-minded thinking that marginalizes people, even those extraordinary ones who change history, and save lives--the "greatest generation" indeed.  
Benedict Cumberbatch plays Turing, a beyond brilliant mathematician and cryptologist, whom shows up at the Bletchley Park "radio factory" for a job.  Bletchley is actually a top secret military installation in England, run by a very uptight Commander Denniston (Charles Dance) and his unit's main function is to break Enigma. 

Turing is just another man on the team led by Hugh (Matthew Goode), and Turing believes he needs a machine to beat the Enigma machine.  The Germans code their messages, and the receiver of those messages uses the Enigma machine--set to the specific setting that changes every day--to decode the message.  The problem is there are over 159 million million (basically, 159 followed by 18 zeroes!) possible settings, so a small unit of men has no chance of running all the settings in the 18 hours they have before the setting changes again--hence the need for a machine that can run those possibilities and spit out the setting that will unlock the messages.  


No one believes in Alan's machine, an issue further complicated by the fact that Alan is a borderline autistic savant, who doesn't get jokes and social niceties.  After Alan appeals to Churchill himself, he becomes head of the project, and needs new cryptologists,  A crossword puzzle test in the newspaper brings out candidates, among them a woman, Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley).  If Turing is dismissed for being odd, Joan is dismissed for simply being a woman in 1940's England.  But she is very talented, and Alan takes a shine to her, and she joins his team. 


Meanwhile the war rages on, London bombed into rubble, people starving, soldiers dying, and the military growing weary of Turing's belief in his "machine" and the lack of results.  The Imitation Game is about secrets upon secrets--the top secret codebreaking team, the possible Soviet double agent in their midst, Joan hiding what she is doing from her disapproving and traditional parents, the MI6 agent Stewart Menzies (Mark Strong) lurking about, and Alan hiding his true self--he is gay, which is illegal in England.  
The film moves between the 1940's and the effort to break Enigma, Alan's years as a child in school (bullied of course), and 1951, when the police investigate a robbery at Alan's home, which leads to his greatest secret being uncovered.  


The film--directed with invisible urgency by Morton Tyldum and well-written (if occasionally on the nose) by  Graham Moore--is a rich experience, a look into secret history, and a time that seems very foreign to us in our more enlightened age.  The scene where the team stumbles into a way to break Enigma is one of my favorite scenes of the year, and the third act is full of one interesting turn after another. 

The supporting cast is excellent, with Dance, Goode and Strong doing their usual outstanding work.  But the film belongs to Cumberbatch (whom has played this type of barely social genius before) and Knightley (she gives one great performance after another, it seems.) 

I defy you not to be a little outraged and sad by the end of the film, as Turing was not only a war hero, his machine also led to the modern computer, and what happens to him is cruel and unforgivable.  Much of the film is about how we marginalize those that are different than us, and how we (as a civilization) may deny people their lives and contributions because they are not what we want or expect.  As such, an undercurrent of anger and melancholy runs under this historical story, that tells us in no uncertain terms that we have come far, but we should never forget how much better we could treat--and empathize with--all people.  

Grade:  "A"